The Dotted Line: Legal trends to watch in 2024


This audio is auto-generated. Please let us know if you have feedback.

This feature is a part of “The Dotted Line” series, which takes an in-depth look at the complex legal landscape of the construction industry. To view the entire series, click here.

As 2024 begins, construction pros are facing continued inflation, supply chain issues, burgeoning cyber threats and project delays. 

While these stress tests can spark conflict, builders (and their lawyers) are also finding creative ways to share the risk and adapt to this environment.

The legal world is also shifting rapidly, from new federal funding mandates to Supreme Court rulings to state-level indemnity clauses. Here are some of the top issues that construction legal experts are watching this year.

Supply chain snarls, inflation will continue to lead to legal disputes

While COVID-19 is no longer upending supply chains like it did early on, its impacts continue to ripple through the industry. Materials disruptions seem here to stay for now amid issues like geopolitical tensions and climate change, and builders are planning accordingly.

A head and shoulders shot of a man in a dark suit with white and grey hair.

James Gallagher

Permission granted by James Gallagher

 

One way contractors are dealing with this uncertainty is through material escalation clauses, said James Gallagher, principal with Marlton, New Jersey-based Resolution Management Consultants, which provides dispute resolution and project management services to the construction industry.

“It’s a matter of how much risk is the contractor taking on, and then how much can they recover if something comes up?” said Gallagher.

Higher prices will bring more lawsuits

As inflation and other factors continue to drive up project costs, contractors and owners are jockeying with each other to distribute risk, according to Norton Rose Fulbright’s 2024 Annual Litigation Trends survey.

“That price escalation [is] causing owners to be more strict with their change order provisions,” said Tim Walsh, head of construction at global law firm Norton Rose Fulbright U.S. The end result is owners putting more effort into enforcing those provisions to stick with the original pricing, he added.

Head and shoulders shot of a man in a dark suit and yellow tie, with a short beard and brown hair.

Tim Walsh

Permission granted by Norton Rose Fulbright

 

One of the key aspects of supply chain challenges now is inflation, according to Gallagher. Contractors try to estimate the cost of materials months down the line, but it could end up being much higher or lower than they planned, which may lead to disputes.

“There are different times when different materials for different reasons become short, and therefore more costly,” said Gallagher. “That’s why then, especially architects, engineers, will look at alternative types of products to maybe implement in a project if certain costs escalate on one type of material versus others.”

More cases will go to arbitration

Other forces are at play, too. COVID-19 shut down much of the U.S. court system for about a year, which created a backlog in many jurisdictions. Gallagher is seeing more clients turn to arbitration instead of waiting — in some cases, for years —  as their case winds through the courts. 

“I think it’s put a little bit stronger of an emphasis on the alternative type of litigation systems such as mediation and arbitration,” said Gallagher. The benefit there, he said, is that parties actually work to truly resolve the dispute, rather than just going through the motions in court. 

Affirmative action ruling will create uncertainty

Last year’s Supreme Court ruling that struck down race-conscious college admissions will likely have wide-ranging ramifications, from classrooms to jobsites. In recent months, companies have been re-examining diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives amid unclear guidance around what is legal or not. 

For now, much of the ruling’s implications remain undefined, which means government workers are doing their best to interpret what it means, said Jennifer Flickinger, government contracts group partner at HKA Global, a construction risk management consultancy.

“Any time you leave something up to the interpretation of an individual, you can get very different results out of the same government agency but different people. And because it’s not defined right now, I think that’s what’s causing that stress or tension,” said Flickinger.

Woman with shoulder length blond hair wearing a purple blazer smiles.

Jennifer Flickinger

Permission granted by HKA

 

For construction, this also affects minority and disadvantaged business designations, which have come under fire via a handful of lawsuits challenging their constitutionality. Before, a contractor could say that they were a disadvantaged business based simply on race, for example, and that’s not the case anymore, she said. Flickinger has seen new applicants that have been denied the MWBE status because they didn’t meet the financial specifications, but hasn’t seen a business lose the designation yet. Still, the full ramifications of the ruling remain to be tested.



Source link

About The Author

Scroll to Top